No Fumar
Sunday, January 22nd, 2006A great op-ed in the NY Times today about a smoking ban in Spain. I guess many of the people there still have vivid memories of Franco, and bristle at anything or anyone who tries to muscle in on their democracy and freedom to make their own decisions.
As I’ve said before, I find many of the smoking ban intrusive, especially in bars where people come to engage in such “healthful” behavior. I find them intrusive in not permitting owners to decide whether or not an establishment should be smoke-free, or smoker friendly. Certainly there can be guidelines, as Spain was forced to concede to, but I think prohibiting smoking in the work place, when one has a private office, really goes too far. Or not allowing people to smoke in the outdoor area of a cafe.
FOR far too many years, almost 40, the people of Spain were treated like minors by Franco’s dictatorship. But it seems that some people among us still yearn for that era. The new antismoking law in Spain, which went into effect with the new year and bans smoking in workplaces and restricts it in many bars and restaurants, is a case in point: it is a clear example of the state trying to regulate citizens’ private lives and customs. As such, it is a measure that is far more befitting of Franco than a democracy.
I suppose this does have more meaning for a nation where democracy is a new and precious commodity. The author and others like him see this move as symbolic of a government trying to take control of very private affairs.
Now, I should say immediately that I am a smoker, like nearly a third of my fellow Spaniards, and I’ve never tried to quit. I know smoking isn’t good for my health, but neither is walking in the polluted streets of Madrid or Barcelona, nor is living in a world where the United States refuses to sign on to the Kyoto Protocol.
Yes, he is absolutely correct. Of course, smoking simply adds another layer to these health and environmental problems, but why not concentrate efforts on cleaning up the air, or controlling greenhouse gases? Answer: Too complicated, too time consuming. It’s easier to pick at cigarette smoking. That is the new cause celebre. The new antidote for all that is wrong.
Indeed, to escape the taint of hypocrisy, Spain would have to match its new antismoking measures with an array of others fighting everything else in the world that is at all harmful. Nowhere have I ever heard, for example, that cars are obliged to carry, just above the driver’s-side door, a warning, like those on cigarette boxes, that “Driving a car may cause death, grisly amputations, quadriplegia and involuntary manslaughter.”
Can you imagine putting that on cars? But yet, he is right. Cars are extremely dangerous. Driving is a major health hazard, worse than smoking. Aside from the fact that automobiles are also major polluters.
Anyway, a very interesting view of the smoking law. It came out today in the New York Times.